Would You Buy This Camera?

Discussion in 'Featured Articles, Reviews & Posts' started by Amin Sabet, Jul 29, 2012.

  1. Amin Sabet

    Amin Sabet   Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    2,461
    rx50.png
    Note: This camera does not exist. But I wish it did.


    -18.3mm (50mm equivalent) f/1.2 optically stabilized prime lens
    -Similar size to RX100 (slightly thicker).
    -Same sensor, AF, display as RX100
    -$650 street price

    Let's call it the RX50.

    Would you buy it?
    Advertisement
     
  2. bkxmnr

    bkxmnr New to the Lounge

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9
    Probably yes. But a 35mm equivalent would make it a definite yes.
     
  3. Chris2500dk

    Chris2500dk Lounge Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    526
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    I wouldn't buy a 50mm equivalent "prime compact", too limiting for my taste. A 35mm equivalent would be interesting.
    A 10mm (28mm equivalent) f2.8 lens, this sensor and the Ricoh GRD control system would be lovely though.
     
  4. Andrewteee

    Andrewteee Lounge All-Pro Subscribing Member S.C. Charter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535
    50/1.2 would be interesting. You'd have to stop down for sharpness, but fast when you need it. 50mm is my preferred focal length. Might buy it.
     
  5. Lili

    Lili Lounge Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    Messages:
    2,430
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Real Name:
    Lili
    In a heart beat. But then my favorite carry-camera is my Ricoh GRD. so using a fast prime lens is familiar and happy to me :)
     
  6. Amin Sabet

    Amin Sabet   Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    2,461
    I'd generally prefer a 35mm equivalent but was thinking that 50 would basically give unprecedented DOF control in this (size) class of camera.

    Would be interesting for sure, and I would definitely buy it.

    A year or two ago, this would have been considered impossible to make. However, the LX3, S90, and RX100 have each taken a step beyond was had been done in terms of speed for a given body size and format size, so I believe this concept RX50 to be possible.
     
  7. retow

    retow Lounge All-Pro S.C. Charter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,067
    Definitely. But I preferred a 40mm equivalent focal length (a slight trade off between dof control and versatility) and it should have at least the option to use an external OVF.
     
  8. Landshark

    Landshark PhotoDog Subscribing Member S.C. Charter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,623
    Location:
    SoCal
    Real Name:
    Bob
    nope, would need to be a 35 or 28, then yes, the dof in a compact would not motivate me
     
  9. Biro

    Biro Lounge All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,663
    Location:
    Jersey Shore
    Real Name:
    Steve
    You're absolutely right about that, Amin. And, as we all know, everything's a trade-off and compromise. But I still think 35mm would be far more useful for general use. Yes, you'd have more depth-of-field control with a 50, but it's just a bit too tight for my personal tastes.

    It's funny. Your recent purchase of a Voigtlander Bessa had me looking at them today - and thinking about optimal focal lengths if I had one lens only. I loved 35mm on film cameras. I was seriously considering picking up a Bessa L zone-focus camera but the only screw-mount lenses still available for it were too wide (15 and 21). I wouldn't go wider than 25 on a general-use film camera.
     
  10. Julien

    Julien Lounge Top Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    751
    Location:
    Paris, France
    Real Name:
    Julien
    I'd definitely consider a 35mm f1.4 IS version of this.
     
  11. greyelm

    greyelm Lounge Top Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Messages:
    790
    Location:
    London, England
    No. No viewfinder.
     
  12. Amin Sabet

    Amin Sabet   Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    2,461
    Tough crowd :biggrin:. I thought the "buy" rate would be much higher.
     
  13. Luckypenguin

    Luckypenguin Lounge Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,272
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Real Name:
    Nic
    Regardless of the focal length, I still wonder about the tactile feel of such a small camera.
     
  14. flash

    flash Lounge Veteran

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    372
    Real Name:
    Gordon
    yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.

    Gordon
     
  15. Amin Sabet

    Amin Sabet   Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    2,461
    I'm on a bit of a 50mm kick of late. Between the Bessa and 50mm Nokton and my Pana Leica 25 being all but crazy glued to the OM-D, it's how I've been rolling for a few weeks now.



    Lili and Gordon - thanks - because of your replies, I don't feel like such a loonie :biggrin:.
     
  16. Amin Sabet

    Amin Sabet   Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    2,461
    I know nothing of development costs, marketing, etc, but posts like these make me wonder what would happen if Sony were to release a whole series of RX cameras with prime lenses across a range of focal lengths: Eg RX20, RX24, RX28, RX35, RX50, RX85. I bet a lot of folks would pick two or even three of them over the option of an interchangeable lens camera system. I'd personally pick either the combination of an RX35 and an RX85 or maybe just an RX50.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Boid

    Boid Lounge All-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,169
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    Real Name:
    Rajiv
    24mm 1.2 with a viewfinder for me. Going that wide, I wouldn't care for IS. Between this and the 35mm on the X100, I would be set for life (or till I get a 645D). But seriously, I would be done with small compacts with these two.
     
  18. serhan

    serhan Lounge All-Pro

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,402
    Location:
    NYC
    Why not:) I prefer the leica 25mm on my m43 also...
     
  19. Tilman Paulin

    Tilman Paulin Lounge Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    429
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    what about a neat 24-35-50mm stepzoom lens? :-D
    Not sure if it would actually make it easier to create a high quality "zoom"-lens that way, but I've always been intrigued by the concept of having three quality primes in one :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Ray Sachs

    Ray Sachs Lounge Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,388
    Location:
    Not too far from Philly
    Real Name:
    you should be able to figure it out...
    I barely ever use my 50ish equivalent lenses on my system cameras - would never buy a camera limited to that. In the film days, I used em because it was all I had. Once good wide angles were available at reasonable prices, I was done with 50s.

    Put a 24 or 28 in it and add a focus/distance scale in the manual focus and I'm there. In fact, if Sony had put any sort of distance scale in their MF display, I'd buy the RX100 - probably already would have. As is, I won't.

    -Ray
     

Share This Page