Results 1 to 1 of 1
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,300
    Real Name
    Amin

    Bokeh Test: Olympus ZD 25mm f/2.8 vs Canon EF 50mm f/1.4


    The ZD 25mm f/2.8 is a tiny lens. Coupled to an E-4xx series Olympus body, one has a DSLR combination approaching the size of digital compacts. In this comparison, I'll be comparing the bokeh from the ZD lens on an E-420 to that from Canon 50mm f/1.4 lens on a 5D. In other words, I'll be comparing the way the two lenses render out-of-focus, blurry areas when used on their respective camera bodies. This is not a sharpness test, nor is it a test of colors and/or contrast. I used Lightroom for the 5D files and Olympus Master for the E-420 files. The 5D images were downsized to 10MP using Photoshop Bicubic Sharper. Then all files from both cameras were downsized to 25% image size using Bicubic Sharper, and Olympus files were slightly cropped to match the 5D aspect ratio. I used a fixed tripod to match perspective for all comparisons and attempted to match exposure with manual settings.

    Here's the gear:

    Name:  2583396344_d7cfdcf0c1_o.jpg
Views: 17614
Size:  119.0 KB

    In each comparison below, the aperture used is indicated on the images. Click on each image to view at the intended viewing size, then use your browser "Back" button to return. Some browser/display combinations will require additional clicks to get to the intended viewing size.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2601431349_8d33fe5e94_o.jpg 
Views:	14668 
Size:	424.9 KB 
ID:	141


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2601431477_0cea0551cb_o.jpg 
Views:	13216 
Size:	453.4 KB 
ID:	142


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2601431227_0127cb3757_o.jpg 
Views:	10323 
Size:	485.7 KB 
ID:	143


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2601431681_2d6084c8ae_o.jpg 
Views:	13218 
Size:	280.2 KB 
ID:	144


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2602259346_8a2bb19a1b_o.jpg 
Views:	12352 
Size:	301.4 KB 
ID:	145


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2601431575_40aaf20441_o.jpg 
Views:	10126 
Size:	334.2 KB 
ID:	146


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2602259562_940e9ee668_o.jpg 
Views:	9542 
Size:	310.0 KB 
ID:	147


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2601432123_afeeccafcd_o.jpg 
Views:	9266 
Size:	323.3 KB 
ID:	148


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2601431913_d3b1441d2b_o.jpg 
Views:	9514 
Size:	342.0 KB 
ID:	149


    The differences in bokeh rendition are pretty subtle here. I think that both lenses do pretty well.

    Addendum: A number of folks have asked me about the differences in color rendition. My feeling is that one should be carefully making any conclusions about color fidelity from this sort of test, because the results are heavily influenced by choice of RAW processor and color profile used in that RAW processor. Similarly, I would not draw conclusions about dynamic range based on these comparisons.


    Originally published on the old Serious Compacts blog. Older comments can be found here: http://seriouscompacts.blogspot.com/...-vs-canon.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Click here to post a deal in Hot Deals.

Links on this page may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.

>> See more discussions




Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.3.0